LTNs Part 1 – The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Wheels for Wellbeing really likes the idea behind Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs). They’re designed to restrict traffic through residential areas and to enable more people to walk, wheel, or cycle, without preventing anyone from driving to any particular point within the neighbourhood.

But LTNs have divided opinion on social media and in real life. Some LTNs have left some Disabled people feeling trapped, ignored or abandoned, experiencing increased anxiety and stress and decreased mobility.

In this two-part blog series, we’re taking a closer look at LTNS – the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly – and consider some solutions for the future.


A smiling woman using a clip on Wheelchair Hand-cycle passes between on road plant boxes that are very wide apart, on one of the plant boxes the words "Road Closed" are visible in whit  writing on a red background.

At Wheels for Wellbeing, we like the aim: to reduce traffic and congestion, make streets safer and more pleasant for residents; improve the quality of the air we breathe by encouraging more people to travel actively around their neighbourhoods. Whilst drivers would not be prevented from accessing any address in an LTN, using the car for short journeys would become less attractive.

For Disabled residents, this should mean:

  • Cleaner air, helping people with respiratory problems
  • Less congestion for those Disabled people who rely on door-to-door transport
  • Safer streets to walk, wheel, or cycle along
  • More opportunities for Disabled people to be active, improving their physical and mental health and allowing greater independence

For some, LTNs have been transformative. But by all means not for everyone.


LTNs are well-intentioned, but that doesn’t mean they’ve always been well-designed and well-implemented. Some Disabled people have experienced:

  • Bollards/planters making streets too narrow to get through on some non-standard cycles
  • Blocked drop-kerbs
  • Excessively long vehicular routes to some addresses
  • Increased traffic and pollution on some boundary roads

Some of the problems have stemmed from the fact that most recent LTNs were introduced under emergency powers, with little or no consultation:

A temporary rubber curb drop leads directly into a temporary on street barrier without even the space to exit the ramp. a Moped user is driving along the road behind.
  • Insufficient information for residents, or only in inaccessible formats
  • Insufficient or inaccessible opportunities to offer feedback
  • Insufficient focus on residents with the greatest needs, or those least able to adapt quickly to change

This meant that some Disabled people could not plan for the disruption or raise concerns in advance when routes through their neighbourhood were suddenly blocked. For others, the longer distance they had to drive was not mitigated by decreased congestion, especially as many people stopped trusting public transport and turned to their cars in droves. Similarly, on some boundary roads, a lack of modal shift from the majority of road users led to increased congestion and pollution. The stress, anxiety, and lack of proper engagement left some Disabled people feeling abandoned and ignored. For them, LTNs have been more “Bad” than “Good”.


A woman dressed in purple riding a hand-cycle away from us is blocked by on street electric charging points and a street that's already too thin.

In fact, many of the reasons behind the anger felt by Disabled people at the introduction of LTNs have nothing to do with LTNs: they stem from the ugly reality of pre-existing, multiple barriers to safe walking/wheeling/cycling for Disabled people. To such an extent that, reducing one’s reliance on motorised transport in the short term is simply impossible to imagine:

  • Missing drop-kerbs
  • Narrow, cluttered pavements
  • Pavement parking
  • Inconsistently applied or missing tactile paving
  • Sharply cambered footways (caused by multiple driveways, tree roots etc.)
  • Limited access to light-weight, independently manoeuvrable wheelchairs or outdoors powered wheelchairs
  • Lack of seating at regular intervals
  • Inaccessible public transport hubs
  • Insufficient financial support or advice for Disabled people to access non-standard cycles
  • All compounded by the fact that few local shops have step-free entrances etc.

In short, the sudden introduction of LTNs under emergency legislation compounded the pre-existing barriers to active travel for Disabled people. They were the straw that broke the camel’s back when causing already limited transport choices to be suddenly disrupted.

A woman with a high-visibility jacket riding a wheelchair clip on hand-cycle is stopped at the edge of a curb which has had some tarmac haphazardly piled against it to create a ramp.

In part two, intended release on Tuesday 7th December, we’ll explore some possible solutions for the bad and the ugly of LTNs.

News archive

Wheels for Wellbeing Guide to Paths, Pavements and Roads

Wheels for Wellbeing
1.              Introduction: These guide sheets are intended to help people work towards creating a more accessible public realm: Without clear definitions, it’s hard to communicate. Our aim is to enable…

Accessible cycle loan scheme arrives in London

Wheels for Wellbeing
On May 10th Wheels4MeLondon was launched: a collaboration between Sustrans, Wheels for Wellbeing and Peddle My Wheels and funded by the Motability Foundation, it will provide free cycle loans for…

Work with us: Inclusive Cycling Advisor

Wheels for Wellbeing
Full-time – job-share considered We are creating new role of Inclusive Cycling Advisor, as part of the forthcoming launch of Wheels4Me London (a fully inclusive cycle loan scheme for the…
Skip to content